I have a copy of Melanie Falick's book Handknit Holidays, and the Stained Glass Scarf has fascinated me since I first leafed through it. Of course I don't have the listed yarns, or even anything close to the required weights.
What I do have though, is four ton of 4 ply Posh sock yarn. My perfect background colour arrived last week (Later from OOW) and then I hunted through said four ton for something ... that caught my eye, I guess.
Left to right: Refresh, Later, Camel. I started off with Refresh, thinking that the yellow, green and peach would give a good contrast to the black and dark grey. But I didn't factor in the varigation. What looks good in socks, does not appeal quite so much in straight lines:
This is the "front" (coloured side) and the "back" (black side) stitched together in one photo. I liked the middle two stripes on the colour side, but not the yellow, orange, blue, green combo on the outer edges. I thought about wearing the scarf with just the black side showing - but that seemed defeatist. Why knit a two-sided, double thickness, truely reversible scarf to only see one side?
So I changed to Camel, which is still varigated but it's tonal with light and dark browns. It still doesn't sing to me like the photo in the book - but I will wear a brown/black scarf more. And then I ripped back what had turned out to be a really large swatch, untangled the three different skeins of yarn (nightmare!) and started again.
I've done about an inch so far, but it's going to be real. slow. going. Did I mention it's sock yarn ... 4 ply on 3mm needles over 64 stitches. I'm using the slip and slide method, which is potentially twice as slow (two passes for every one row), because I tried the two stranded method and messed up the pattern. At this rate, the scarf will probably be done for next winter.
A moody Saturday Sky:
Unlike today, with its blue skies and wispy white clouds. Today it's cold though, and they threaten snow for the middle of the week. Brrrrr ....






















Girl, you are my hero.
Posted by: Dee | Tuesday, January 16, 2007 at 03:30 PM
Looks interesting, despite the slowness!
Posted by: Mary-Lou | Saturday, July 07, 2007 at 01:08 PM